What is common sense? Common sense, properly defined is a common thought or belief used within a group that holds similar or common beliefs and values. It’s a good way of identifying groups that gather and unite to express a common front. However, many people use the term ‘common sense’ in a derogatory manner in which the exclamatory person is expressing his/her own perspectives regardless of others emotional capacities, cognitive understandings, cultural values or social structure. The expectation that we globally share the same perspectives is erroneous.
When using this statement, people are making the assumption that there is a universal commonality or understanding of their own perspective, which is very often not the case and often leads to a lot of confusion and frustration. The way we see things as individuals can vary on so many aspects.
To use ‘common sense’, we would have to be surrounded with people who…
‘Common sense’ is very useful when a person or group is trying to define a very restricted identity on all fronts; emotional, relational, cognitive and environmental. For example, people who want to define and express their beliefs, like Greenpeace, will have a use for ‘common sense’ to group, unite, define and propulse their beliefs into the world. We have to be aware, as a group, that this identifies but a select group of people, not the entirety of civilization. That is why people who travel a lot and experience different cultures and civilizations tend to not use the term ‘commons sense’ because they understand that it never really applies.
As well we have to consider that ‘common sense’ is forever shifting on an individual basis. As people’s perspectives; emotions, relations, cognitive abilities and belief systems shift, so does their definition of ‘common sense’. That is why we see many people shift and move between groups, organizations and social identities and belief systems.
When expressing our personal perspectives with others we should use the term ‘common understanding’ which implies an understanding between two or more people. There is a verbal exchange of ideas and perspectives to reach a ‘common understanding’. This exchange and understanding is absent from ‘common sense’.
Maybe universal ‘common sense’ is something to strive for. Would this not also mean that we have achieved or defined a universal truth? I believe it’s a very noble objective but for now we are quite far from achieving such a state. So for the time being, be aware of the use you make of ‘common sense’, it may not be as ‘common‘ as you think.